![]() ![]() (Notably, just grabbing a splitter with a frequency of 2500 on its label is not recommended, as many such splitters are optimized for satellite signals, which would be sub-optimal for MoCA. In all cases, the splitters would ideally be right-sized to just the number of ports needed, to minimize path losses, and the splitters would be "designed for MoCA 2.x" models. ( Example diagram just pretend the modem & router are a single DSL gateway.) Alternatively, many people choose to connect the main bridging MoCA adapter via the splitter input port and hang the other MoCA nodes off the output ports - precluding use of a MoCA filter. goCoax WF-803M MoCA adapters work with most routers, but you should check compatibility before buying. I prefer sticking with the typical approach of all MoCA nodes connected via outputs of the splitter, with a "PoE" MoCA filter installed on the input port of the splitter to retain the known reflective benefit of the MoCA filter, but capping the MoCA filter with a 75-ohm terminator, as, as you've noted, the cable ISP feed is unneeded. Would this still work with the moca adapters?Ĭlick to expand.Your confusion is mirrored in all the different ways people choose to connect their MoCA gear in your situation, absent the Internet or cable TV feed that forces a given orientation. In terms of that setup, that's what I was thinking, but what confuses me is since I have Bell internet which comes in on DSL phone lines (and not coaxial), it seems like nothing is powering the coaxial network. Option 1 Setting up MoCA without a MoCA-router or modem Set up is simple. Can you show me an example one? I'm not sure what you are referring to here. When you say this "I would get simple ones that just connect all the ports together not the ones like you have with in and out. With support for both MoCA 2.5 and MoCA 2.0, the ECB6250K02 is backward compatible with existing MoCA networks, allowing you to enjoy faster speeds and greater. I can replace the 1-3 splitter in the basement to something like this if you think its bestīut if there is another splitter somewhere behind the walls, I have no idea how to determine if there is one and how to get to it. My guess is its a DSL connection, as I don't really see a dedicated modem, and none of the coaxial ports appear to be in use. I don't know exactly how they set up the internet, but there is a Bell Hub 2000 upstairs which connects on phone lines labelled DSL. Reasonable to assume you’d be looking for MoCA 2.5, so that pretty much limits the field to the Verizon G3100 (I think). Then again, maybe I should not get cheap about the MoCA adapters and just go with the latest standard.So my internet is a very standard bell internet. With the bonded MoCA 2.0 standard being newer, I am sure it could not hurt, but I am wondering what kind of advantages it has over non-bonded when there is no usage of the line other than by the internet signals. If so, does it matter as to whether the MoCa adapter is bonded? For instance, could I get away with one like this? The coax lines are and will be used only for internet. Keep in mind if you want some future proofing get gigabit switches and bonded moca 2.0 adapters.īy the way, we do not have any cable or satellite TV service, nor do we plan to get any OTT (we have cut cords). ![]() ![]() That switch connects to another deco via ethernet and also supplies a moca adapter that connects to another adapter that connects to another deco. (Or, skip this step if you have a MoCA-router which acts as one of the adapters in the pair.) Second, connect another MoCA. With MoCA 2.5, you can reach speeds up to 1 Gbps and you get more advanced security. MoCA 2.5 is the upgrade from 2.0, so it offers all of the same benefits and more. I have my main deco connected to a switch. MoCA 2.0 is backward compatible to 1.0 and 1.1. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |